This shows you the differences between the selected revision and the current version of the page.
maintenance:may_17th_2018 2018/08/03 23:11 | maintenance:may_17th_2018 2020/02/14 16:11 current | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
== The results first : System with 9418 atoms, 4 fs/step (HMR) == | == The results first : System with 9418 atoms, 4 fs/step (HMR) == | ||
- | ^ Box/GPU combination ^ Performance in ns/day ^ cudaPME OK ? ^ ns/day without cudaPME ^ Local NAMD ? ^ | + | \\ |
- | | n0011 IBM server (32 cores on a AMD 6234@2.4GHz, no cuda) | **70** | - | | | | + | |
- | | Old Q6600 @ 2.4GHz box + **GTX 1050** | **140** | ✔ | | | | + | <html><center></html> |
- | | n0009 (i7-975, 4 cores @ 3.33 GHz) + **GTX 1050** | **210** | ✔ | | ✔ | | + | |
- | | n0010 (AMD FX-8150, 8 cores @ 3.6 GHz) + **GTX 1050** | 200 | No | **150** | | | + | ^ Box/GPU combination ^ Performance in ns/day ^ cudaPME OK ? ^ ns/day without cudaPME ^ |
- | | n0012 (AMD FX-8350, 8 cores @ 4.0 GHz) + **GTX 1050 Ti** | 240 | No | **200** | ✔ | | + | | n0011 IBM server (32 cores on a AMD 6234@2.4GHz, no cuda) | **70** | - | | |
- | | Scarlet (i7-6800K @ 3.4GHz + **GTX-1070**) | **450** | ✔ | | | | + | | n0007 (Old Q6600 @ 2.4GHz box) + **GTX 1050** | **140** | ✔ | | |
+ | | n0009 (i7-975, 4 cores @ 3.33 GHz) + **GTX 1050** | **200** | ✔ | | | ||
+ | | n0010 (AMD FX-8150, 8 cores @ 3.6 GHz) + **GTX 1050** | **200** | ✔ | **150** | | ||
+ | | n0012 (AMD FX-8350, 8 cores @ 4.0 GHz) + **GTX 1050 Ti** | **230** | ✔ | **200** | | ||
+ | | Scarlet (i7-6800K @ 3.4GHz + **GTX-1070**) | **460** | ✔ | | | ||
+ | | n0013 (i9-9900K @ 3.6GHz + **GTX-1080**) | **560** | ✔ | | | ||
+ | | n0014 (i9-9900K @ 3.6GHz + **RTX2070S**) | **575** | ✔ | | | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | __**NOTE :** cudaPME is stable and without problems with NAMD v.2.13 with the nvidia 410.78 driver.__ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <html></center></html> | ||
\\ | \\ |